How Cronbach’s Alpha Can Strengthen Your Survey

The World's Research Marketplace

Find, buy, and analyze third-party research from top providers.

explore marketplace
letter-a

Assessing a survey’s validity is essential to ensure you obtain meaningful data, and Cronbach’s alpha (CA) is a useful measurement to use during the survey validation process. Although your survey expert and even computer programs are now designed to calculate CA for you, it’s wise to understand the concept in order to best understand its importance.Definition and FunctionCronbach’s alpha is a statistic that gauges the internal consistency of survey questions that load into the same factors. Factor loading can be assessed using principal component analysis (PCA), a validation method we discussed in a previous article.While your goal with PCA is to determine what your questions are actually measuring, your goal with CA is to determine if questions that are measuring the same factors are correlated and therefore produce consistent responses.CA measures how well a set of questions assess a single, one-dimensional latent variable in a group of individuals. As opposed to observable variables, latent variables are aspects that are not observed but rather inferred, or variables that are not directly measured.Ideal uses for CA involve measuring the internal consistency among survey questions that:

  • You believe all measure the same factor
  • Are correlated with one another
  • Can be constructed into some type of scale

Role as Reliability MeasureAs a reliability measure, CA basically lets you know if a survey respondent would give you the same response with regard to a specific variable if you were to present that variable to the respondent again and again.While you could actually present the same variable to the same respondent by asking the person to fill out the same survey multiple times, that solution is not a feasible one. Not only does the undertaking run the risk of annoying respondents, but is also time consuming and costly. Measuring internal consistency using CA can instead solve the problem.CA ValuesCronbach alpha values range from 0 to 1.0, with many experts saying the value must reach at least 0.6 to 0.7 or higher to confirm consistency. If you find a lower value while assessing your CA, some programs let you to reassess CA after removing a specific question. This allows you to pinpoint and eliminate questions that do not produce consistent responses to increase the accuracy of your survey.How CA WorksLet’s say you’re collecting automotive industry survey data and you want to determine the level of anxiety motorists experience while driving. While you could certainly outright ask respondents about their anxiety levels, self-reporting with a single question in this type of area may not always produce the most accurate results.You could instead ask a series of questions that all measure anxiety levels, and then combine the responses into a single numerical value that helps you more accurately assess overall anxiety.To achieve this, you can first devise a table with 10 items that record the degree of anxiety respondents experience in certain driving situations. Score each item from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating no anxiety and 4 indicating high enough levels of anxiety to make them stop driving. You then sum up the scores on all 10 items to determine the final score.For these questions to be accurate, they need to have internal consistency. Because the questions all measure the same factor, they need to be correlated with one another. Applying CA to the questions helps to ensure they are, with CA values typically increasing when the correlations between the questions increase.CA is generally used to determine internal consistency among questions that are based on a scale, such as the example above, or questions with two possible answers.CA CaveatsCA can be a valuable measurement, but it does come with a few issues of which you should be aware.

  • The alpha measurement in CA can only accurately estimate reliability if the questions are τ-equivalent. That means the questions can have different variances and means, but their co-variances need to be equivalent, implying they have at least one common factor.
  • Alpha relies not only on the degree of correlation among the items, but also on the number of items in your scale. If you keep increasing the number of items on your scale, the similarities among questions can appear to increase – even though the average correlation remains unchanged.
  • If two different scales are each measuring a specific aspect and you combine them to create a single, longer scale, your CA measurements will again be skewed. Alpha would likely be high by combining the two scales, although the combined scale is looking at two different attributes.
  • An extremely high alpha value is not always a positive thing. Alpha values that are too high may suggest significant levels of item redundancy, or items asking the same question in subtly different ways.

Despite the potential issues, CA remains a useful statistic in the survey validation process, especially if you enlist help from solid resources and survey professionals while employing it. Whether you’re collecting insurance survey data or measuring customer loyalty, CA can help ensure your questions are internally consistent, your survey valid and your results on the mark when it comes time to analyze survey data.

Game changing benefits of research data warehouse